Related: Financing Ecosystem Services & Nature-Based Solutions [MRV].
Industry leaders
Positives and benefits of web3 carbon market approaches:
In a recent paper co-authored by James Pittman (a Regen scientist and core contributor):
As interests and investments continue to scale, many current issues concerning transparency, manipulation, additionality, permanence, monitoring and reporting bottlenecks, friction, and transaction costs, will be made insignificant if not irrelevant due to the deluge of innovation and market participation we see in the space today. The flaws we see today are simply the growing pains of a maturing set of means to address the climate crisis. What seems unsolvable and unacceptable now will undoubtedly and indeed, imperatively produce a net benefit for our climate, environment and society
The removal market needs to grow 20,000x to reach IPCC level significance.
Driving demand for “carbon offsets” is negative for the climate — within this system/technology set [so, we should encourage unique theses around fixing it]
If a startup only proposes to work within the current system, they’re incentivized to drive demand for the current broken market. In doing so, they’re effectively e-commerce platforms instead of climate startups — packaging dubiously valuable products in the casing of “feel good about the climate.”
Personal notes/ other insights:
“This is an old trick from the financial industry: Make things more complex.”